The judgment reflects the $355 million — plus interest and growing daily — that state Judge Arthur Engoron ordered Trump to pay after a monthslong trial.

The trial stemmed from a lawsuit brought by state Attorney General Letitia James. She claimed that Trump, his company and key executives engaged in fraud by pumping up the tycoon-turned-politician’s fortune on financial statements that helped secure loans and insurance.

Trump, now once again the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, denied the allegations, as did his co-defendants. The defense said bankers and insurers used the unaudited statements only to inform their own assessments of Trump’s finances, rather than basing business decisions on them. He says the documents understated his wealth, anyway.

Engoron ruled last month for the attorney general. Trump appealed.

What did the appeals court do?

A five-judge panel of appeals judges agreed Monday to put the collection on hold if Trump puts up $175 million within 10 days. It was a considerable reprieve, especially given that one of the judges had turned down Trump’s earlier offer of a $100 million bond.

Under New York law, someone can hold off enforcement of a judgment during an appeal by posting a bond — essentially, a guarantee that the money will be paid if the appeal fails — or otherwise covering the amount owed. The idea is to ensure that people who have won judgments will be able to collect if they’re upheld.

Usually, that means the whole amount, but appeals courts can consider whether debtors would suffer an irreparable loss if they covered the judgment but later won their appeals, explains Jay Auslander, a New York lawyer who specializes in collecting big judgments.

Trump, for example, suggested on social media last week that he’d have to sell or mortgage properties, “perhaps at Fire Sale prices, and if and when I win the Appeal, they would be gone. Does that make sense?”

His lawyers said he was unable to arrange a bond for the full $454 million-plus. They said potential underwriters were requiring 120% of the judgment, or over $557 million, in collateral and would take only cash or other liquid assets, not real estate.

The Trump Organization’s top lawyer, Alan Garten, said in a sworn statement that posting the full amount could affect the company’s ability to retain employees, meet obligations and otherwise sustain its business. Trump, meanwhile, said on his Truth Social platform that he has almost $500 million in cash but wants the option of spending some on his campaign.

James’ office, meanwhile, had filed notice of the judgment, a technical step toward potentially moving to collect.

What does Trump plan to do now?

Shortly after learning of the appeals court’s decision, Trump said he would swiftly come up with a bond, equivalent securities or cash.

Various companies offer appeals bonds, for a fee. They typically also require collateral.

“The bonding company is not going to put up a bond unless they’re assured that they’re going to get paid back if they have to pay,” says Gregory Germain, a Syracuse University College of Law professor whose focuses include commercial law and bankruptcy.

Collateral can come in various forms, such as providing cash or pledging an investment account or, at least in theory, real estate.

Before Monday’s ruling, Trump insurance broker and friend Gary Giulietti told the appeals court in a sworn statement that major underwriters generally won’t issue a single bond for over $100 million. State lawyers have suggested Trump could get bonds from multiple sources. That has happened in other cases.

As for Trump’s coffers, he could reap a windfall from his stock in his social media company. Share prices shot up Tuesday during Trump Media & Technology Group Corp.’s first day of trading on the Nasdaq exchange.